Democratic Leadership Style Examples

Post Views: 239

(Last Updated On: April 20, 2021)

Democratic leadership has its own style and particular examples. Democratic leadership, also known as participatory leadership or partnership leadership, takes a more participatory role in the decision-making process by group members in a leadership style. This article will give an overview of the democratic leadership style and examples.

Democratic leadership style examples

This democratic leadership can apply to private companies from any government business school.

Everyone is given a chance to participate, ideas are freely exchanged, and discussions are encouraged.

While the democratic process tends to focus on group equality and the free flow of ideas, the leader of the party is still there for guidance and control.

It has been decided against the democratic leader that it is decided who is in this party and who can contribute.

Researchers have found that the democratic leadership style is one of the most effective types and leads to higher productivity, the better contribution from group members, and increased group morale.1

Properties

Some of the primary characteristics of democratic leadership include:

Members of the party are encouraged to share decisions and opinions, though leaders have the final say on the decision.

Members of the group feel more involved in the process.

Creativity is encouraged and rewarded

Researchers suggest that good democratic leaders have specific characteristics, including:

Honesty
Intelligence
Courage
Creativity
Efficiency
Honesty

Powerful democratic leaders inspire confidence and respect among followers.

They are sincere and their decisions are based on their morals and values.

Followers feel motivated to take action and contribute to the group. Good leaders also tend to seek different opinions and do not try to silence dissenting voices or those who provide popular views.

Pros

Cons

Communication failure

Poor decision making by inefficient groups –

Rejecting minority or individual views

A democratic leader understands that there is no organization without its people. He looked at his and others’ positions of responsibility rather than status and often consulted in decision-making.

The democratic system encompasses the idea that everyone, because of their human dignity, should participate in party decisions.

Democratic leadership invites the participation of staff members and others, not only in decision making but also in shaping the organization’s vision.

The democratic leader still holds the ultimate responsibility of making decisions even after praying, evaluating, and taking into consideration the opinions of others.

The leader still has the final say on what to do with the team members’ ideas.

This democratic leader believes that although the success of the organization depends on the cooperation and cooperation of all team members, the responsibility for the outcome of the decisions made depends only on the leader

Some models of democratic leadership can fall into this responsibility at the hands of a governing party or a small group such as the executive committee.

Features of democratic leadership

This style of leadership encourages discussion, debate, and sharing of ideas and making people feel good about their involvement.

Democratic leadership can lead to better ideas and more creative solutions to problems as group members are encouraged to share their thoughts and ideas.

It allows everyone to have an opinion on how things should be done, and where the company should go. Bringing everyone’s ideas, it enriches the prospects of the organization

Democratic style leadership still requires guidance and control of a particular leader.

Democratic ritual leadership demands who should be called within this group and to decide what will be given the right to participate, decide, and vote.

The situation where effective

Democratic leadership works best in situations where group members are skilled and eager to share their knowledge.

Promotes friendship and good relationships throughout the company

Helping people feel valued is important, and even more so if those opinions are included in a final decision or policy.

Allow the team to provide input before making a decision, though the degree of input can vary from leader to leader.

Encourage creativity and a level of engagement and commitment

Leads to higher job satisfaction and productivity

Effective when quality is more important than efficiency or productivity

Effective for creative groups like advertising and design because they need innovative ideas to create new ideas and designs

Exploring processes and possibilities in-depth to determine problems or processes while being effective in a consultation environment

Effective in the service industry to innovate to meet changing customer needs

In situations where it is not effective:

Although democratic leadership is one of the most effective leadership styles, it has some potential downsides. Here are some situations like this:

Where roles are unclear or abstract of time, democratic leadership can lead to communication failure and incomplete projects.

This is a time-consuming process, and when using this style, people should be identified as contributing, planning, and then voting for the best course of action. Therefore there is a disadvantage of quick and clear decision making which comes with the abolition of advice.

This style is important when a team contract is important, but it can be difficult to manage when there are many different perspectives and ideas.

Advantages

Because group members are encouraged to share their thoughts, democratic leadership can lead to better ideas and more creative solutions to problems.

Members of the group feel more involved and committed to the projects, creating the possibility of caring about their end result.

Research on leadership style has further proven that democratic leadership leads to higher productivity among group members

Disadvantages

While democratic leadership is described as the most effective leadership style, it is somewhat diminishing. In situations where roles are unclear or in the essence of time, democratic leadership can lead to communication failure and incomplete projects.

In some cases, members of the group may not have the knowledge or skills necessary to contribute to the decision-making process.

Democratic leadership can also arouse feelings of non-consideration of the views and ideas of team members, which can reduce staff satisfaction and morale.

The best setting of the use of democratic leadership

Democratic leadership works best in situations where group members are skilled and eager to share their knowledge.

It’s also important to have plenty of time for people to contribute, develop a plan, and then vote on the best course of action.

Democratic or autocratic?

But first, it must be understood that democratic leadership operates only in a favorable market environment.

If your business is struggling or facing severe external competition that requires dynamic and informed decision-making, an autocratic approach – as demonstrated by Leonard de Schaeffer of the Blue Cross of California – is even more advisable.

Considering the right situation, democratic leadership can be highly productive.

To get started, team members are given enough time to express their creative side, which – depending on your industry – can be significant.

As a leader, you still command from the front, but always time to encourage your staff to provide input, ideas, and insights.

It works particularly well in the creative industries and professional services companies, where the staff is highly qualified and skilled and where all members of the team have a high degree of mutual respect.

It is also a style that is as flexible and powerful as it is shown below, in many different areas.

Examples of democratic leadership

When you think of managing a business, jazz can seem like a strange place to find leadership lessons. But jazz bands (also known as “big” bands) are a great example of how democratic leadership can work for you.

Take for example a simple stitch. Typically composed of at least ten musicians (each playing different instruments), a jazz band is often operated by a conductor or bandleader who is responsible for bringing together different sound and harmonic performances into a cohesive production – just like a startup.

However, what makes jazz truly democratic is that within the framework of shit music, each musician – at certain points – as a democratic leader allows their staff to contribute, while also allowing them the freedom to show and show their creative side their own thoughts and ideas.

The jazz band example also highlights the difficulty of keeping things on track as a democratic leader.

Since there are so many different sounds coming out of the band, it takes a tremendous amount of coordination and collaboration to create music that is pleasing to the ear.

Within your organization, you need to use similar leadership qualities to keep your strategies consistent and goal-oriented.

Democratic leadership at the senior management level

As a sport with a final emphasis on collectives, football is a fertile field where different styles of management development.

Starting from dictators like Fabio Capello and Jose Mourinho, as far-sighted as Pep Guardiola and Johan Cruyff, it is no wonder that management gurus often highlight similarities between football coaches and business leaders.

Football management also serves as a great example of how democratic leadership can work at the senior management level.

In the past, football managers traditionally handled all aspects of the club, while modern-day coaches – while leaving the primary decision maker for all football – usually work with a small and dedicated team.

For example, in many Premier League clubs, the head coach will appoint an assistant director who plays a role similar to that of a company’s chief operating officer (COO).

The assistant will spend most of their time on the training ground with the players, and a good head coach will receive their suggestions and recommendations as the players work each day.

In fact, in all aspects of the club, the head coach alone makes no specific decision; When it comes to player fitness, for example, they will closely consult with physio, fitness coaches, and performance analysts.

When scouting opposing or potential future players, many clubs usually operate within the committee structure, usually with head coaches, scouts, and data analysts.

Like a football coach who is not a physiotherapist, there is no possible way for a business owner to understand the ins and outs of every aspect of your company.

Thus, practicing the style of democratic leadership is key to ensuring development and making the most informed decisions are made.

Democratic leadership in the right environment

While sports and crafts are interesting areas to explore, in the end, it is an example of democratic leadership in business that offers the most value.

Silicon Valley giants such as the now traditional Tiger Silicon Valley giants like Google and Facebook are often great examples of companies where democratic and inclusive management styles were profoundly influential in their success.

In Google’s first days, founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin were tasked with hiring CEO Eric Schmidt to purposefully develop the aggression of experts in particular fields, recognizing them as more liberal than their individuality.

Google still manages this policy to a certain extent, ensuring that the company’s infamous hiring process only hires the best.

Apple followed a similar approach, led by Tim Cook, which was far from the dictatorial and far-sighted style of his predecessor, Steve Jobs.

Indeed, under Cook, the company has debuted as a more democratic and inclusive work environment, where employees are encouraged to share their opinions and ideas about the design and features of key products. It is also to his credit.

Although he had the design, marketing, and foresight flyer to be able to run Apple almost single-handedly, Cook realized his own limitations and avoided the temptation to get a job 2.2.

His willingness to involve others in the decision-making and strategy-development process has cost the brand $ 1 trillion in market value – proof, if it is not already needed, that democratic leadership can truly pay off.

As mentioned, democratic leadership is not always the right choice.

While unsuccessful businesses and recessions can benefit from more autocratic styles of leadership trapped in the weather, hard and dangerous industries such as oil spills and mining are not well suited to such a democratic approach.

However, when creativity and knowledge are high on the priority list, your business will undoubtedly benefit more from this inclusive approach.

Famous example

Throughout the United States, there have been many organizations and leaders who have applied democratic/participatory leadership, including:

George Washington
Mayo Clinic
Google
Abraham Lincoln
Amazon.com
Guinea Rometty
Twitter1